The Future's History of Grameen
I was first privileged to spend 3 hours with Dr Yunus in Dhaka in the
new year of 2008. I had just started hosting a 1000 person bookclub, and before I started even bigger experiments connecting
collaboration citizens and Yunus, I wanted to be sure the world's happiest banker wasn't just a brand image. Confessinmg
that makes me feel very dim indeed. Within minutes of meeting Yunus, I knew this was one of the 2 best things n life - as
a dad, birth of my daughter can never be bettered!
But it wasnt just Yunus. Every person you meet at Grameen is
magic -at the top of their game, and ensuring all their co-eowrkers are helped to be too. Before I left I was told that the
west coast internet comapnies hadnt spent any of their first 25 years applying the net to the majority of the world's
people ... that Dr Yunus was inviting them to get creative with capitalsim; that within 5 years here would not only
be a Grameen bank in every village but his social busienss models was about to replicate a grameen solution telecentre
everywhere. Of course this future would sound like just a hero's dream - but that would be to fail to
understand the history, the first 30 years of compound organisational development, it would be to assume that our times have
more brilliant entrepreneurs than Dr MY. My advice would be any such sceptism would be the biggest error of your life.
Typical Transcript (from
NBR) of Grameen's Compound History
Yunus: I wanted to give money to people like this woman so that
they would be free from the moneylenders to sell their product at the price which the markets gave them -- which was much
higher than what the trader was giving them.
NBR: But even then you charged
interest.
Yunus: Oh yes ... Definitely, yes.
NBR: And why is that? What was the thinking?
Yunus: I thought
if you do things in a businesslike way, then the project can become as big as you want it to because you are earning enough
money to cover all your costs. You are not dependent on anybody. You are not dependent on a limited supply of capital. This
is business money. Business money is limitless. And then, you can reach out to many more people than you would otherwise do.
NBR: So this is not charity?
Yunus: This
is not charity. This is business: business with a social objective, which is to help people get out of poverty. Other banks
were not giving loans to these people.
NBR: So how did you get from that first
$27 to working with Grameen Bank and expanding this around the globe?
Yunus:
The villagers got very excited that I gave them the money. To them, it was like a miracle. Seeing this, a question came to
my mind. If you can make so many people so happy with such a small amount of money, why shouldn't you do more of it? Why
shouldn't you reach out to many more people? I could do this by linking these people with a bank that could lend them
the money. So I went to the bank and proposed that they lend money to the poor people. The bankers almost fell over. They
couldn't believe what had been proposed to them. They explained to me that the bank cannot lend money to poor people because
these people are not creditworthy. So a long series of debates began with me and the banking system. Finally, I resolved it
after about six months by offering myself as a guarantor. I said, 'I will sign the loan papers. I will take the risk,
and you give the money.' I got the money and gave it to the people. And luckily for me, all the people paid it back. The
banks had been saying that I would never get the money back and would ultimately have to pay it back myself. I said, 'I
don't know anything. Let me try it out.' And I tried it, and it worked.
NBR:
Has it continued to work?
Yunus: Yes, and we expanded it from village to village.
But we still saw that the banks weren't changing their minds even after I had demonstrated that there was no risk to the
process, that banks could do better by giving money to poor people, who were paying it back, than to rich people, who were
not paying it back.
NBR: Poor people were paying the money back [more reliably]
than rich people?
Yunus: Much better than rich people. Because Bangladesh
has a tradition of rich people who borrow money from the big banks and hardly pay it back.
NBR: That's pretty startling.
Yunus: Very startling, yes.
NBR: You have said that you loaned primarily to women. Why is that?
Yunus: It has to do with the decision to have a separate bank for the poor people. From the beginning, I had
complained about the banking system on two grounds. One complaint was that the banking system was denying financial services
to the poor people through certain rules it had set up. The second allegation was that the banking system also was not treating
women fairly. If you look at the gender composition of all the borrowers of all the banks in Bangladesh, not even 1% of the
borrowers happen to be women. I said this is a very gender-biased organization. So when I began, I wanted to make sure half
the borrowers in my program are women so that they are even. I did that. It was not easy because women themselves didn't
think that they should borrow money. I had to do a lot of convincing. I encouraged them to believe that they can borrow money
and make money. Part of that effort was to overcome fears -- cultural fears -- and the fact that they had never had any experience
with business and so on. Soon we saw that money going to women brought much more benefit to the family than money going to
the men. So we changed our policy and gave a high priority to women. As a result, now 96% of our four million borrowers in
Grameen Bank are women.
NBR: So you say you have four million borrowers. How
much money over time have you loaned out? Yunus: If we start with that $27, and you add on all the money that we have loaned,
it's nearly $5 billion that we have given over time. Now we have come to a stage where every two years we are giving $1
billion. So half a billion dollars a year. That's the stage we are in.
NBR:
And this keeps funding itself because of the interest that's being paid?
Yunus:
That's right. We take the deposits and we offer the depositors good interest rates. The money we lend to the borrowers
makes a profit for the bank.
NBR: While people say that your program works
well, some also say that it tends to focus on the top tier of poor people. How do you respond to that -- the criticism that
it doesn't get to the people who really need such basic things as food and shelter?
Yunus:
Grameen Bank helps poor people of all classes, of all types. Bottom, middle, and higher levels. Our work started with $27
to 42 people. Although we say we can work with all levels, and Grameen Bank is an example, still people don't pay attention
to what we do. They just say, 'Oh no. Microcredit. It's not doing the right thing, focusing only on the upper level
of poor people.' So last year we started to focus on the beggars. Our argument is you can't be poorer than beggars.
That's the last stage of your survival. You go around and beg for food, collect rice, cook it at home and then eat. That's
your daily survival ration. So we are interested in them. We are saying, 'Look, as you go house to house, would you carry
some merchandise with you -- some cookies, candies, toys for the kids and so on ? to sell?' People love that. We thought
initially we would have 4,000 to 5,000 borrowers in that program, but as the year ended we had more than 26,000 beggars. They
are very happy because they have seen that when they go to houses which have never opened their front door to them, that door
is now open. The beggars show their merchandise and they are given a stool to sit on, which they never had before. The beggars
not only sell but also get respect from the families.
NBR: We have recently
seen elections in Iraq for the first time. Self determination is the hope there. In a sense, is that what your program does?
It changes people?
Yunus: Definitely. Actually, if you look at it one way,
the microcredit we give to the women is a tool to explore one's self, how much capacity that is stored up inside: 'I
never knew that I had the capacity. That creativity. That ingenuity. To make money to express myself. So that money gives,
for the first time, an occasion for me to find out how much I can do.' When you were successful in the first round, when
you took tiny amounts -- $30, $35 -- and went into business and paid back the loan, you are now much more equipped to do better.
Bigger. So you ask for a $50 loan, a $60 loan, because you think you can do bigger business and more challenging business
than when you first took out an easy loan.
NBR: It gives you that self confidence.
Yunus: That self confidence. And if you go through 10 rounds and 15 rounds you are ready
for a much bigger challenge than you thought. We introduced information technology into the system. We created a cell phone
company called Grameen Phone and brought the phone into the villages of Bangladesh. We gave loans to the borrowers to buy
a cell phone and start selling phone service. It became a growing business. Now that they are already confident business women,
they can very easily come into a business which they never heard of before. They never saw a telephone in their life but they
accepted it as a business idea, and there are now more than 100,000 telephone ladies all over Bangladesh doing good business
and connecting Bangladesh with the rest of the world.
NBR: Do they use the
telephone in their business, or is this a business itself?
Yunus: It's
a business itself. If I have a phone, since nobody else has a phone, they have to come to me to use it. They make a call and
pay. It's like a public telephone call office. The owner of the phone becomes a one-person public phone office.
NBR: So it's the newest technology for people who have never had a telephone or anything
like that.
Yunus: That's right. People complain that microcredit will
let these women raise only chickens and cows and nothing else, that they are always stuck with primitive technology and don't
have the capacity to move up to a new technology. So this is again a demonstration